Wolven ([info]wolven) wrote,
@ 2009-01-04 02:51:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:tired, thinking
Current music:Mad Men

Things I Need, Part One: Nanotechnology
The next couple of days, I'm going to be doing some little missives on things I need, things I want to see, in the world. They'll be of varying length, and on individual subjects. If you happen to have more knowledge on any of the subjects than I do (and I don't see how you wouldn't), then you should feel free to weigh in.

First up, Nanotech:

To begin, I want you to think about the potential for the interface of the systems of will, thought, and action. A connection of mind and body, throughout each and every cell of the body, when the cybernetic component is achieved. We can, with the proper programming, time, and knowledge come to a near-instantaneous change in matter commbinations, developing an instinctual reflexive matrix fromm adaptaion and integration of stimuli. For a pop-culture reference, see the 'Ultimates' version of The Hulk.

Which Brings me to my next point: The pain inherent in the rapid adaptations and changes to physiology, intentional or no. Think about the growth pains asssociated with the rapid development of teenagers, and accelerate that, exponentially. Pain is an inevitability. So what do we do about it? Is there any way to facilitate these biological changes, without the attendant pain? There is the option of the dispersal of anesthesia, distributed in each microscopic structure, each "nanobot," such that prior to the changes in structure being implemented the onset of pain is pre-empted. Or perhaps not.

Maybe the pain is a necessary component of the process, one that can be used to gauge the true dedication to the process. When we receive a tattoo or a piercing, we experience the pain of the needle. It is part and parcel to the experience and, as LUXT said, it lets us know that we're alive, lets us know what we're doing. Where are we, when we allow ourselves to not be hurt by the changes we make to ourselves, in ourselves?

Again, think of the ability to change our structure at will, to adapt reflexively, in all senses of the word. A visceral, intuitive interface between the mind, the body, the machines. The first stages of the complete blurring and redefinition of those lines.

I'm too tired to keep going, now, but think about it, and tell me what you think.




(Post a new comment)


[info]lillornyn
2009-01-04 03:00 pm UTC (link)
Having worked for a brief time (albeit ten years ago) in solid state physics, I remember my mentor telling me that nanotechnology was something that he thought he would be able to see in his lifetime, and certainly in mine/yours. And good gods, does it change the game -- for instance, you can throw cellular biology out the window once you can repair damage to tissue on a molecular level.

I'd chatter about it more, but I am waaaay too hungover. ;)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]wolven
2009-01-05 03:19 pm UTC (link)
How about now?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]giana
2009-01-04 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Do you remember that dream I had about you and Patrick developing nanotechnology that would destroyed people?

Yeah. No. Stop it.

-Sabrina

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]wolven
2009-01-04 05:43 pm UTC (link)
I had forgotten about that dream (see most recent posts, as to why I like to know these things).

I like to think that I can learn lessons to prevent that, maybe not on my own, but with the help of others ;)

But i will definitely keep that dream in mind, as I go on.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]momentai
2009-01-04 06:09 pm UTC (link)
Everyone with grand schemes likes to think they'd be able to prevent catastrophe, but it never works out that way, at least as far as pop culture is concerned. I would concentrate on having adequate contingency plans in place to combat the fuck up as opposed to beleiivng it possible to avoid it altogether.

Not me discouraging you or anyone just saying that, for my money, i find it far more useful to be Batman than Superman.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]l_the_fangirl
2009-01-04 08:03 pm UTC (link)
Not to say that Superman isn't useful to have around... but so are kryptonite bullets.

IMHO.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]momentai
2009-01-04 08:08 pm UTC (link)
he's useful, yes, but overall, his attitude tends to ruin things.
He's very much of the mind that

"i am awesome, I am powerful, I can totally fix everything by virtue of being me, therefore, I need no forethought or planning."


(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]wolven
2009-01-04 08:11 pm UTC (link)
I think if Superman Comics dealt more in this kind of failure to introspect, and an coming to terms and change of behaviour, in this vein, I might read them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]l_the_fangirl
2009-01-04 08:26 pm UTC (link)
Pretty much, yus.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]wolven
2009-01-04 08:12 pm UTC (link)
Good way to put that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…